Marc R. Rosenblum
Specialist in Immigration Policy
William A. Kandel
Analyst in Immigration Policy
Congress
has a long-standing interest in seeing that immigration enforcement agencies
identify and deport criminal aliens. The expeditious removal of such
aliens has been a statutory priority since 1986, and the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) and its predecessor agency have operated programs
targeting criminal aliens for removal since 1988. These programs have grown substantially
since FY2005.
Despite the interest in criminal aliens, inconsistencies in data quality, data
collection, and definitions make it impossible to precisely enumerate the
criminal alien population, defined in this report as all noncitizens ever
convicted of a crime. CRS estimates the number of noncitizens incarcerated
in federal and state prisons and local jails—a subset of all criminal aliens—at 173,000
in 2009 (the most recent year for which complete data are available), with
state prisons and local jails each accounting for somewhat more
incarcerations than federal prisons. The overall proportion of noncitizens
in federal and state prisons and local jails corresponds closely to the
proportion of noncitizens in the total U.S. population.
DHS operates four programs designed in whole or in part to target criminal
aliens: the Criminal Alien Program (CAP), Secure Communities, the §287(g)
program, and the National Fugitive Operations Program (NFOP). The CAP,
Secure Communities, and certain §287(g) programs are jail enforcement
programs that screen individuals for immigration-related violations as they are being
booked into jail and while they are incarcerated; the NFOP and some §287(g)
programs are task force programs that target at-large criminal aliens.
This report describes how these programs work and identifies their common
features and key differences among them.
While consensus exists on the overarching goal to identify and remove serious
criminal aliens, these programs have generated controversy, particularly
Secure Communities and the §287(g) program. On one hand, the Obama
Administration and other supporters of jail enforcement programs see them
as efficient and even-handed ways to identify criminal aliens. The Administration
has taken steps to strengthen and expand Secure Communities and plans to implement
the program in every law enforcement jurisdiction in the country by the end of
2013. On the other hand, some lawmakers and advocacy groups have raised
concerns that Secure Communities and the §287(g) program have not been
narrowly targeted at serious criminal offenders and that the programs may
have adverse impacts on police-community relations, may result in racial
profiling, and may result in the detention of people who have not been
convicted of criminal offenses and/or may not be subject to removal.
Disagreements about the merits of jail enforcement programs overlap with a
separate set of questions about the role of states and localities in
immigration enforcement. These jurisdictional questions have focused in
particular on Secure Communities, in part because the Obama Administration
initially appeared to present it as a discretionary program but now takes the position
that states and localities may not “opt out” of Secure Communities.
Legislative issues related to Secure Communities and other ICE programs that
Congress may consider include clarifying the role of state and local law
enforcement agencies in immigration enforcement, the Obama Administration’s
exercise of prosecutorial discretion, mandating new data collection in
response to concerns over racial profiling at the state and local levels, and clarifying
the statutory authority for states and localities to detain unauthorized
aliens.
Date of Report: December 20, 2012
Number of Pages: 52
Order Number: R42057
Price: $29.95
To Order:
R42057.pdf
to use the SECURE SHOPPING CART
e-mail congress@pennyhill.com
Phone
301-253-0881
For email and phone orders, provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card
number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail
or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.