113th Congress may consider a
comprehensive reform of the nation’s immigration system (CIR), and during
such discussions, the detention of noncitizens in the United States might be an issue.
Congress may choose to reevaluate detention priorities (i.e., who should be
detained, when they should be detained) and detention resources. Under the
law, there is broad authority to detain foreign nationals
(aliens/noncitizens) while awaiting a determination of whether the noncitizen should
be removed from the United States. The law also mandates that certain
categories of aliens are subject to mandatory detention (i.e., the aliens
must be detained). Aliens subject to mandatory detention include those
arriving without documentation or with fraudulent documentation, those who
are inadmissible or deportable on criminal grounds, those who are inadmissible
or deportable on national security grounds, those certified as terrorist
suspects, and those who have final orders of deportation. Aliens not
subject to mandatory detention may be detained, paroled, or released on bond.
The priorities for detention of these aliens are specified in statute and regulations.
For example, the Illegal Immigrant Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
of 1996 (IIRIRA) increased the categories of aliens subject to mandatory
detention. This increase has raised concerns about the justness of
mandatory detention, especially as it is applied to asylum seekers arriving
without proper documentation.
As of December 22, 2012, on an average day in FY2013, there were 34,696
noncitizens in Department of Homeland Security (DHS) custody. The amount
of detention space is almost exclusively controlled by Congress through
appropriations, and Congress has been active in providing oversight of
detention space allocations and detention conditions. Since FY2002, Congress
has increased the number of funded detention beds from 21,109 beds to 34,000
beds. As DHS increases its ability to identify aliens who are subject to
removal from local jails in more remote locations, the nationwide
allocation of detention space may become an issue.
Furthermore, the detention policy for aliens who have received a final order of
removal may also be a congressional concern. After a final removal order
has been issued against an alien, the law provides that the alien be
removed within 90 days, except as otherwise provided in the statute. Certain
aliens subject to a removal order “may be detained beyond the removal period
and, if released, shall be subject to [certain] terms of supervision.”
This provision had been interpreted as permitting indefinite detention
where removal was not reasonably foreseeable, but in 2001, the U.S.
Supreme Court in Zadvydas v. Davis, interpreted it as only permitting
detention for up to six months where removal was not reasonably
foreseeable. Nonetheless, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that its ruling
was made “absent clear guidance from Congress” (i.e., that it was not clear what
congressional intent was related to detaining aliens who could not be removed
within 90 days). Comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) bills in the 109th and 110th Congress would have modified
and codified the regulations regarding the detention of those with final orders
of removal. In the 112th Congress,
H.R. 1932, as reported by the House Judiciary Committee would have amended
the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow DHS to indefinitely detain,
subject to six-month reviews, aliens under orders of removal who could not
be removed if certain conditions were met.
Date of Report: January 18, 2013
Number of Pages: 21 Order Number: RL32369 Price: $29.95
For email and phone orders, provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card
number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail
or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.